| Home | | PROMOTE | | Calendar of Events | | News & Grant Information | | Conferences, Presentations, & Outreach | | Committees | | SERT: Science and Engineering Recruitment Team | | Team Members | | Best Practices | | Search Committee Tools | | Talking Points: Searches, Diversity, & Decision Strategies | | Recruiting Resource Links | | Recommendations for Deans | | Informal Resources for Visiting Candidates | | NAHPD: Native American & Hispanic Professional Development | | Faculty Programs | | Interactive Theatre | | Resources | | About Us |
|
|
Talking Points: Searches, Diversity, & Decision Strategies
Important Facts About Searches, Diversity, and Decision Strategies
-
NSF
data indicate that 84% of married women with doctorates have a spouse
who works full time; 42% of married men with doctorates have a spouse
who works full time.
-
55% of women scientists are married to another scientist; 32% of of men scientists married to another scientist.
Source:
National Science Foundation Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 1996
Arlington
VA (NSF96-311)
-
The best candidates in under-represented groups are generally disinclined to explore employment at universities without clear and publicized standards for promotion and tenure and procedures for partner accommodation.
-
When
department heads/chairs were asked to evaluate whether a candidate was
qualified for a position in their department based on a CV, they were
significantly more likely to rate the candidate as qualified if a male
name was on the CV than if a female name was on it, although the CVs
were identical.
Even diversity-friendly selection committees
invariably rank female and minority candidates lower when using a single composite measures (e.g. overall impression).
-
When female and minority candidates are ranked on the basis
of several numerical, multi-objective criteria, the same candidates do better than predicted from a single, overall ranking.
-
Decision-making processes based on explicit, multiple, numerical criteria which
are chosen at the inception of the selection process are less
acrimonious among faculty, result in more qualified and accepted job
candidates, and are more fair to underrepresented groups.
-
Interviewees,
successful and unsuccessful, frequently meet in the future and compare
notes, and invariably talk about interview experiences with colleagues
and mentors.
Searches with
unevenly asked questions
,
unclear goals and decision criteria, and
impolite or disinterested participants convey a lasting negative impression of both department and university. A track record of bad experiences makes it more difficult for the institution to attract quality candidates in future hires.
-
Advertisements
written with more specific job responsibilities/research areas in mind
are generally more successful in attracting both more highly regarded
and more diverse faculty.
Think about writing a
prototype role statement for your potential hire before you advertise
to guide the advertisement and the search.
-
"Google" is now an accepted verb in Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary.
What is and is not explicitly stated regarding positions and practices speaks loudly to modern job applicants.
|
|
|